Edwards v. State

788 So. 2d 1108, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8824, 2001 WL 716707
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 2001·No. No. 2D00-3463·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, Allen P. Edwards challenges his convictions and sentences on four counts of burglary of a dwelling. Although he maintains that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress his confession, any error on the part of counsel is not apparent of record. Having found no harmful, reversible error in the convictions or sentences, we affirm without prejudice to Edwards’ ability to raise his ineffectiveness of counsel argument in a post-conviction petition. See Ivey v. State, 775 So.2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 788 So. 2d 1108, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8824, 2001 WL 716707 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

788 So. 2d 1108 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards v. State
865 So. 2d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Rodriguez v. State
788 So. 2d 1108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)