Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Edwards v. State

Edwards v. State

761 So. 2d 1175, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7556, 2000 WL 789851
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edwards v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 721 So. 2d 744 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 2000·No. No. 4D99-3105·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Colije Edwards appeals from his conviction and sentence for burglary with a battery and aggravated battery. Edwards argues that his conviction for aggravated battery must be vacated under the double jeopardy clause citing Crawford v. State, 662 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). This court recently decided this issue in Blevins v. State, 756 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), finding that the two charges are separate offenses under section 775.021, Florida Statutes (1997), and certifying conflict with Crawford. Edwards’s arguments on this issue and all other points raised are without merit. We affirm.

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 761 So. 2d 1175, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7556, 2000 WL 789851 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

761 So. 2d 1175 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blevins v. State
756 So. 2d 1052 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Crawford v. State
662 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)