Edwards v. State

648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 311, 1995 WL 18389
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1995·No. No. 94-2712·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no error in the lower court’s order rejecting claims one, two or three of appellant’s application for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The court’s ruling on grounds four and five relies on the transcript of the sentencing hearing, which is not attached to the order. Accordingly, we remand for the lower court to either attach the pertinent portions of the record or to conduct a hearing.

REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 311, 1995 WL 18389 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

648 So. 2d 326 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. State
701 So. 2d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)