Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edwards v. State

543 So. 2d 290, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1032, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2194, 1989 WL 39543

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 1989

DocketNo. 4-86-2182

StatusPublished

This text of 543 So. 2d 290 (Edwards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edwards v. State, 543 So. 2d 290, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1032, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2194, 1989 WL 39543 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We believe the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction. In addition, on the evidence presented, we believe a reasonable jury could have found that appellant’s alleged theory of the case did not present a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See Berriel v. State, 524 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We also find no reversible error in the other issues raised on appeal,

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We believe the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction. In addition, on the evidence presented, we believe a reasonable jury could have found that appellant’s alleged theory of the case did not present a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See Berriel v. State, 524 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We also find no reversible error in the other issues raised on appeal,

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 So. 2d 290, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1032, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2194, 1989 WL 39543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack