Edwards v. State
This text of 275 So. 2d 265 (Edwards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants-appellants were charged with and convicted of conspiracy to commit a felony, to wit, robbery. Defendants contend the trial court erred by denying defendants’ requested instruction on conspiracy to commit a misdemeanor, to wit, petit larceny. Finding that defendants’ requests were properly made and should have been granted under the decision and for the reasons set forth in Brown v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So.2d 377, we reverse and remand for a new trial. See Sprinkle v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 48; King v. State, Fla.1957, 104 So.2d 730; see also F. S. Section 833.05, F.S.A.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 So. 2d 265, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-state-fladistctapp-1973.