Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edwards v. State

193 So. 2d 182, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4725

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 30, 1966

DocketNos. 189, 201

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 So. 2d 182 (Edwards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edwards v. State, 193 So. 2d 182, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4725 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are consolidated appeals by Willie Edwin Sayles, Jr., and Albert Edwards from judgments and sentences entered pursuant to jury verdicts finding defendants guilty of conspiracy and robbery.

The record reveals that the only item of any possible appellate merit had to do with an alleged improper communication with the jury. This matter was raised for the first and only time in an amended motion for new trial filed by the Defendant-Sayles. However, he did not present this motion to the trial court for its consideration and ruling, but instead chose to file his notice of appeal with this court. This action constituted an abandonment of his motion and its contents. State ex rel. Faircloth v. District Court of Appeal, Third District, Fla.1966, 187 So.2d 890.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C. J., and ANDREWS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These are consolidated appeals by Willie Edwin Sayles, Jr., and Albert Edwards from judgments and sentences entered pursuant to jury verdicts finding defendants guilty of conspiracy and robbery.

The record reveals that the only item of any possible appellate merit had to do with an alleged improper communication with the jury. This matter was raised for the first and only time in an amended motion for new trial filed by the Defendant-Sayles. However, he did not present this motion to the trial court for its consideration and ruling, but instead chose to file his notice of appeal with this court. This action constituted an abandonment of his motion and its contents. State ex rel. Faircloth v. District Court of Appeal, Third District, Fla.1966, 187 So.2d 890.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C. J., and ANDREWS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 So. 2d 182, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-state-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack