Edwards v. State

73 So. 188, 72 Fla. 264
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 21, 1916·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

—On writ of error to a judgment of conviction of murder in the second degree it is contended that the evidence does not establish the identity of the deceased and that the testimony shows justification, thereby not supporting the verdict. The body of the deceased was identified by testimony as to a deformed hand and a cut on the head received just before the homicide. There is no substantial showing of justification and ample evidence to sustain the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 73 So. 188, 72 Fla. 264 (Fla. 1916).

73 So. 188 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northern Supply Co. v. Town of Greybull
560 P.2d 1172 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1977)
Riverton Valley Electric Ass'n v. Pacific Power & Light Co.
391 P.2d 489 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1964)