Edwards v. Southern Railway Co.

195 S.E. 394, 213 N.C. 212, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 47
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edwards v. Southern Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 N.C. 61
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 2, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was heard in this Court at Fall Term, 1937, ou the appeal of the defendant Southern Railway Company from an order of the Superior Court of Swain County, denying its petition for the removal of the action from the Superior Court of Swain County to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina for trial. The order was affirmed. See Edwards v. R. R., 212 N. C., 61.

At the trial of the action in the Superior Court of Swain County, all the evidence showed that at the time plaintiff’s intestate fell from the defendant’s train, he was riding on said train as a trespasser. There was no evidence tending to show that his fall from defendant’s train was caused by any wrongful and willful act of the defendant Southern Railway Company, or of any of its employees. The judgment dismissing the action is affirmed. See Bailey v. R. R., 149 N. C., 169, 62 S. E., 883; Hayes v. R. R., 141 N. C., 195, 53 S. E., 847; Cook v. R. R., 128 N. C., 333, 38 S. E., 925.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. Southern Railway Co., 195 S.E. 394, 213 N.C. 212, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 47 (N.C. 1938).

195 S.E. 394 (Edwards v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brock v. . R. R.
62 S.E. 883 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Hayes v. Railroad
53 S.E. 847 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
Edwards v. Southern Railway Co.
192 S.E. 855 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Bailey v. North Carolina R. R.
62 S.E. 912 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Cook v. Southern Railway Co.
38 S.E. 925 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1901)