Edwards v. Shinseki

Federal Circuit

Edwards v. Shinseki

547 F. App'x 998

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 12, 2013·No. No. 2013-7022·Published

Opinion

RADER, Chief Judge.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ determination that Michael P. Edwards’ October 17, 2007 purported Notice of Disagreement was invalid under pertinent VA regulations. Because Mr. Edwards seeks review of issues of fact and the application of law to fact beyond this court’s statutory jurisdiction, 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2), this court dismisses the appeal.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RADER, Chief Judge.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ determination that Michael P. Edwards’ October 17, 2007 purported Notice of Disagreement was invalid under pertinent VA regulations. Because Mr. Edwards seeks review of issues of fact and the application of law to fact beyond this court’s statutory jurisdiction, 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2), this court dismisses the appeal.

DISMISSED

Edwards v. Shinseki, 547 F. App'x 998 (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Pincite

547 F. App'x 998 (Edwards v. Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related