Edwards v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

113 S.E. 134, 120 S.C. 294, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 132
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 25, 1922·No. 10978·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

This is an action for damages, in which the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff, in the sum of $100 actual damages and $600 punitive damages.

At the conclusion of the testimony, the defendant’s attorneys made a motion that the issue as to punitive damages be withdrawn from the jury, on the ground that there was no testimony from which the jury might infer that there had been a willful and wanton invasion of the plaintiff’s right by this defendant. The motion was refused, and the sole exception in the case is as follows:

“Because his Honor erred, it is respectfully submitted, in refusing defendant’s motion for a verdict as to punitive damages; it being respectfully submitted that there was no evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer that there had been a willful and wanton invasion of plaintiff’s rights,' or such conscious failure to observe due care as would amount to wilfulness.”

As the facts are somewhat complicated, it will be necessary to report the complaint and answer (omitting the formal allegations).

*317 A careful consideration of the testimony satisfies this Court that the ground upon which the defendant appealed is not sustained by the testimony.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co., 113 S.E. 134, 120 S.C. 294, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 132 (S.C. 1922).

113 S.E. 134 (Edwards v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.