Edwards v. School Dist. No. 222, Cotton Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Edwards v. School Dist. No. 222, Cotton Co.

1921 OK 249, 200 P. 143, 82 Okla. 188, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 229

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 28, 1921

Docket10032

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1921 OK 249 (Edwards v. School Dist. No. 222, Cotton Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edwards v. School Dist. No. 222, Cotton Co., 1921 OK 249, 200 P. 143, 82 Okla. 188, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 229 (Okla. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

KANE, J.

The petition of plaintiff contained several paragraphs, each paragraph, after the first, referring to the others and making them a part thereof. The first paragraph of the petition was an action upon a warrant issued by school district No. 222, and admittedly stated a cause of action against the defendant. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to this petition upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant, and it is to reverse this action that this proceeding in error is commenced.

It was error for the trial court to sustain the general demurrer to the petition. As against a demurrer a petition must be liberally construed and all its allegations taken as true and admitted, and if any fact stated entitles plaintiff to any relief, the demurrer should be overruled. Hughes v. Martin, 81 Okla. 89, 196 Pac. 951; Danciger v. Isaacs, 82 Okla. —, 200 Pac. 164.

Councel for defendant in error concede that defects in some one or more separate paragraphs of a petition containing several counts will not justify the sustaining of a general demurrer thereto when one of the paragraphs states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, but contend that the case at bar falls within an exception to this general rule. We think the case is governed by the general rule.

For the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the petition.

HARRISON, C. J., and JOHNSON, MILLER, and KENNAMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KANE, J.

The petition of plaintiff contained several paragraphs, each paragraph, after the first, referring to the others and making them a part thereof. The first paragraph of the petition was an action upon a warrant issued by school district No. 222, and admittedly stated a cause of action against the defendant. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to this petition upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant, and it is to reverse this action that this proceeding in error is commenced.

It was error for the trial court to sustain the general demurrer to the petition. As against a demurrer a petition must be liberally construed and all its allegations taken as true and admitted, and if any fact stated entitles plaintiff to any relief, the demurrer should be overruled. Hughes v. Martin, 81 Okla. 89, 196 Pac. 951; Danciger v. Isaacs, 82 Okla. —, 200 Pac. 164.

Councel for defendant in error concede that defects in some one or more separate paragraphs of a petition containing several counts will not justify the sustaining of a general demurrer thereto when one of the paragraphs states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, but contend that the case at bar falls within an exception to this general rule. We think the case is governed by the general rule.

For the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the petition.

HARRISON, C. J., and JOHNSON, MILLER, and KENNAMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1921 OK 249, 200 P. 143, 82 Okla. 188, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-school-dist-no-222-cotton-co-okla-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack