Edwards v. Rider
This text of 86 S.E. 90 (Edwards v. Rider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence, though weak, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find the property subject to the execution. In such cases the Court of Appeals is without power to reverse the judgment of the lower court, overruling a motion for a new trial based solely upon the usual general grounds.
2. It appearing, however, that the final judgment as entered by counsel for the plaintiff in fi. fa. is not in accord with the verdict returned by the jury, it is ordered that a judgment conformable to the verdict be entered by the lower court. Judgment affirmed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 S.E. 90, 17 Ga. App. 40, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-rider-gactapp-1915.