Edwards v. Ninth Avenue Railroad

22 How. Pr. 444
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided January 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judge Daly,

after hearing the argument of counsel, determined that all proceedings must stay in this action until the plaintiff paid the defendant the costs incurred in the marine court, and also costs of the present motion. That' [445] it would be a dangerous precedent to permit a party to harass another by first discontinuing in one suit and then allowing him to commence another before payment of costs of first action. That the uniform practice of this court is, in such cases, to stay the proceedings until all the costs of the former suit are paid, and also the costs of the motion to stay, &c.

Order entered in accordance with decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. Ninth Avenue Railroad, 22 How. Pr. 444 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1860).

22 How. Pr. 444 (Edwards v. Ninth Avenue Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Behrens v. Sturges
138 A.D. 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Weil v. Manheim
66 Misc. 565 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1910)
Wilner v. Independent Order Ahawas Israel
122 A.D. 615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Ingrosso v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
105 A.D. 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)