Edwards v. New Jersey & H. R. Railway Co.

134 N.Y.S. 1131

This text of 134 N.Y.S. 1131 (Edwards v. New Jersey & H. R. Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwards v. New Jersey & H. R. Railway Co., 134 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Action by Dean G. Edwards against the New Jersey & Hudson River Railway Company. C. E. Thomall, for appellant. B. L. Rich, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on 144 App. Div. 554, 129 N. Y. Supp. 717. Order filed.

INGRAHAM, P. J., and DOWLING, J., dissent, on former dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. New Jersey & Hudson River Railway & Ferry Co.
144 A.D. 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-new-jersey-h-r-railway-co-nyappdiv-1912.