Edwards v. Morley
This text of 110 N.W. 1133 (Edwards v. Morley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought to have the boundary between the land of the-parties ascertained. The controvery turned on the location of the government corner. The court found that it was lost and fixed a boundary line-which made an equitable division of the land. The evidence was conflicting, and we find no reasons for reversing the order. The assignments of errorr have all been considered, and found without merit.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 N.W. 1133, 100 Minn. 542, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-morley-minn-1907.