Edwards v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Edwards v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.

210 N.W. 686, 191 Wis. 328, 1926 Wisc. LEXIS 273

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 9, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 N.W. 686 (Edwards v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edwards v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co., 210 N.W. 686, 191 Wis. 328, 1926 Wisc. LEXIS 273 (Wis. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Vinje, C. J.

We perceive no abuse of discretion on the part of the circuit court in granting a new' trial. In such case the order must be affirmed. Raether v. Filer & Stowell Mfg. Co. 155 Wis. 130, 143 N. W. 1035.

As there must be a new trial, we purposely forbear to comment upon the testimony causing the setting aside of the verdict further than to state that it should not form the basis of a judgment.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vinje, C. J.

We perceive no abuse of discretion on the part of the circuit court in granting a new' trial. In such case the order must be affirmed. Raether v. Filer & Stowell Mfg. Co. 155 Wis. 130, 143 N. W. 1035.

As there must be a new trial, we purposely forbear to comment upon the testimony causing the setting aside of the verdict further than to state that it should not form the basis of a judgment.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 N.W. 686, 191 Wis. 328, 1926 Wisc. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-milwaukee-electric-railway-light-co-wis-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack