Edwards v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This text of Edwards v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Edwards v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit LORICO S. EDWARDS, Petiti0ner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Resp0n.dent. 2011-3236 Petiti0n for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF0752110678-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER The Depart1nent of Defense moves to reception to name the Merit Systen1s Protection Board as respondent L0rico S. Edwards opposes Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the B0ard's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here,
EDWARDS V. MSPB 2 the Board dismissed Edwards’ appeal for lack of jurisdic- tion. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review. Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE CoURT FEB 09 2012 /sf J an Horba1y Date J an Horbaly _ C1erk on cc; Lorico S. Edwards W11ham P' B3‘Ye1’ ESq' u.s. could i1li§%EAr.s son J ames M. E1senmann, Esq. 11-15 FEn5nALc1ncu|T 621 FEB 09 2012 JAN HORBAL¥ amax
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edwards v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2012.