Edwards v. McNeely

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Edwards v. McNeely

200 S.E. 493, 58 Ga. App. 859, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 155

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 5, 1938·No. 26995·Published

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

1. Tlie assignment of error on the objection to evidence is not meritorious. The complaint as to the charge of the court to the jury, when considered in connection with the entire charge, is also without merit.

2. The evidence amply supported the verdict of damag'es in favor of the plaintiff for malicious prosecution, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Querry, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

1. Tlie assignment of error on the objection to evidence is not meritorious. The complaint as to the charge of the court to the jury, when considered in connection with the entire charge, is also without merit.

2. The evidence amply supported the verdict of damag'es in favor of the plaintiff for malicious prosecution, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Querry, J., concur.

Edwards v. McNeely, 200 S.E. 493, 58 Ga. App. 859, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 155 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

200 S.E. 493 (Edwards v. McNeely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.