Edwards v. Kupec
This text of Edwards v. Kupec (Edwards v. Kupec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7364
ANTWON EDWARDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT KUPEC, Warden; MAJOR WILLIAM MACOCK; DAVID TWILLEY, Sergeant; DONALD ADAMS, Correctional Officer II; COSIMO GIORDANO, Lieutenant; ROBERT RITCHEY, Chief; WILLIAM SONDERVAN, Commissioner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 03-891-DKC)
Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 5, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antwon Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Antwon Edwards appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Edwards v. Kupec, No. CA-
03-891-DKC (D. Md. filed July 29, 2003 & entered July 30, 2003).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edwards v. Kupec, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-kupec-ca4-2004.