Edwards v. Kessler

419 S.E.2d 21, 262 Ga. 346
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1992
DocketS92A0183
StatusPublished

This text of 419 S.E.2d 21 (Edwards v. Kessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwards v. Kessler, 419 S.E.2d 21, 262 Ga. 346 (Ga. 1992).

Opinion

Fletcher, Justice.

The trial court denied a motion to dismiss the insurance carrier as a defendant, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee against appellants, a motor carrier, its employee, and its insurance carrier. The sole issue on appeal is appellants’ challenge to the constitutionality of OCGA §§ 46-7-12 (e) and 46-7-58 (e) which permit an injured person to sue both the motor carrier and its insurance carrier in the same action. We held in Grissom v. Gleason, 262 Ga. 374 (418 SE2d 27) (1992), that the joinder provision does not violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution of Georgia of 1983. Accordingly, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Weltner, C. J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grissom v. Gleason
418 S.E.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 S.E.2d 21, 262 Ga. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-kessler-ga-1992.