Edwards v. . Kearsey

75 N.C. 409

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edwards v. . Kearsey. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 N.C. 241 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1876·Published

Opinion

Hill v. Kesler, 63 N.C. 437, governs this case and sustains his Honor's ruling.

Gunn v. Barry, 82 U.S. 610, relates to the exemption laws of Georgia, where the disparity between former and present exemptions is "striking," and affords self-evidence of conflict with the Constitution of the United States, which forbids laws which impair the obligation of contracts. Whereas there is no belligerency between our former and present exemptions, but they are in peaceful conformity. Garrett v. Cheshire, 69 N.C. 396.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: Lowdermilk v. Corpening, 92 N.C. 336; Hughes v. Hodges,102 N.C. 242.

NOTE. — The above ruling was reversed on writ of error to U.S. Supreme Court. Hill v. Kessler, 96 U.S. 595. See 79 N.C. 664.

(413)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Kesler, 63 N.C. 437, governs this case and sustains his Honor's ruling.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: Lowdermilk v. Corpening, 92 N.C. 336; Hughes v. Hodges,102 N.C. 242.

NOTE. — The above ruling was reversed on writ of error to U.S. Supreme Court. Hill v. Kessler, 96 U.S. 595. See 79 N.C. 664.

(413)

Edwards v. . Kearsey, 75 N.C. 409 (N.C. 1876).

Pincite

75 N.C. 409 (Edwards v. . Kearsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Gunn v. Barry

82 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1873)

Edwards v. Kearzey

96 U.S. 595 (Supreme Court, 1878)

Hill v. . Kessler

63 N.C. 437 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1869)

Garrett v. . Chesire

69 N.C. 396 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1873)

Lowdermilk v. . Corpening

92 N.C. 333 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)

Edwards v. Kearzey

79 N.C. 664 (Supreme Court, 1877)

Opinion

Related