Edwards v. Kearney

14 Neb. 83
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 14 Neb. 83 (Edwards v. Kearney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwards v. Kearney, 14 Neb. 83 (Neb. 1883).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

The bill of exceptions in this case having been stricken from the files of this court, in accordance with the opinion reported in 13 Neb., 502, the record is simply here for our examination without such bill.

Where it is sought to present to this court alleged errors occurring at a trial in the district court, a bill of exceptions, settled and signed as required by law, is indispensably necessary. And while in a proper case, upon timely application, this court would by mandamus compel the signing of such a bill by a trial judge, yet no other paper, record, or showing can be made to take its place. There being no error assigned, other than those depending upon the bill of exceptions, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Diers Bros. & Co.
245 N.W. 419 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1932)
Troyer Furniture Co. v. Orchard & Wilhelm Co.
237 N.W. 144 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1931)
Gaines v. Warrick
202 N.W. 866 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1925)
Denise v. City of Omaha
69 N.W. 119 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Nelson & Cook v. Johnson
62 N.W. 244 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Scott v. Spencer
60 N.W. 892 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Neb. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-kearney-neb-1883.