Edwards v. Gilliland

Alabama Court of Appeals

Edwards v. Gilliland

109 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 668

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 25, 1926

Docket7 Div. 118.

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 924 (Edwards v. Gilliland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edwards v. Gilliland, 109 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 668 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

*669 BRICKEN, P. J.

Appellant filed a motion to retax the cost in the case in which he was defendant in the court below. This motion coming on to be heard, was submitted to the court, and after a hearing thereon the motion was granted in part and denied in part. Each party being taxed with one-half of all costs, including the expense of gathering the crop. Appellant reserved an exception to this ruling and brings the case here for review on the record alone.

The transcript submitted to this court does not contain the evidence that was before the trial court, there being no evidence in the record to sustain the facts alleged in the motion.

Under the authority of McCord v. Bridges et al., 207 Ala. 376, 92 So. 447, the case must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*669 BRICKEN, P. J.

Appellant filed a motion to retax the cost in the case in which he was defendant in the court below. This motion coming on to be heard, was submitted to the court, and after a hearing thereon the motion was granted in part and denied in part. Each party being taxed with one-half of all costs, including the expense of gathering the crop. Appellant reserved an exception to this ruling and brings the case here for review on the record alone.

The transcript submitted to this court does not contain the evidence that was before the trial court, there being no evidence in the record to sustain the facts alleged in the motion.

Under the authority of McCord v. Bridges et al., 207 Ala. 376, 92 So. 447, the case must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-gilliland-alactapp-1926.