Edwards v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 217 S.E.2d 190 (Edwards v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the rulings of Duran v. Judson, 128 Ga. App. 459 (197 SE2d 163), and Judson v. Duran, 231 Ga. 206 (200 SE2d 872), which affirmed the Court of Appeals’ decision, it was not error to grant the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The defendant’s sole defense was lack of consideration because she was a surety for her husband’s debt. Under the above cited decisions, while this might prevent a levy after judgment on her tangible personal property, it would not immunize her from a judgment based on her execution of the note.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 S.E.2d 190, 135 Ga. App. 186, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-georgia-railroad-bank-trust-co-gactapp-1975.