Edwards v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

175 A.D. 913

This text of 175 A.D. 913 (Edwards v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwards v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 175 A.D. 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except De Angelis, J., who dissented on the ground that it was error prejudicial to the defendant to permit witnesses called by the plaintiff to testify that the deceased told them the cause and the nature of what troubled him, in view of the statements of plaintiff’s counsel in connection therewith; in permitting experts called by the plaintiff to express then opinions of the source of the infection which was claimed to have been the cause of the death of the deceased; and in permitting a witness to testify that he had been infected in the same manner as that in which the plaintiff claimed the deceased had been.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.D. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-fidelity-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1916.