Edwards v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
This text of 263 A.D. 715 (Edwards v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In our view, an examination of the defendant for the purpose of framing a eomplaint is not necessary in the circumstances here disclosed. So far as the production of the contract is concerned, it now appears that a copy has been furnished to plaintiff. Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and the motion denied. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 715, 31 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-elizabeth-arden-inc-nyappdiv-1941.