Edwards v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
263 A.D. 715, 31 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4667
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 1941·Published
Opinion
In our view, an examination of the defendant for the purpose of framing a eomplaint is not necessary in the circumstances here disclosed. So far as the production of the contract is concerned, it now appears that a copy has been furnished to plaintiff. Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and the motion denied. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edwards v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc., 263 A.D. 715, 31 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
263 A.D. 715 (Edwards v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.