Edwards v. . Edwards

61 N.C. 534
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1868·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pearson, C. J.

It is a maxim in courts of equity, that “ a party must come in with clean hands,” and probably it would be good policy to require one who files a petition for a divorce, to purge his conscience in the manner indicated by his Honor. It certainly would prevent a great many applications.

But the subject of divorce is regulated by statute, Rev. Code, ch., 39, “ Divorce and Alimony,” and there is nothing in the statute to authorize a construction, which would empower the court to impose a “ test oath ” of this kind. On the contrary, the fifth section, which declares what matter shall be set out in the petition is silent as to an averment of *535 this kind, and the tenth section provides that, if such matter shall he proved, “ the same shall be a good defence, and a perpetual bar against the suit,” thus ekpressly making it a matter oí defence, and no where intimating that the party shall take an oath of his own innocence as a condition precedent to the right of instituting the suit.

Order in the court below reversed. This will be certified.

Per CuRiAir. Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. . Edwards, 61 N.C. 534 (N.C. 1868).

61 N.C. 534 (Edwards v. . Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinney v. . Kinney
63 S.E. 97 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)