Edwards v. Edwards

708 So. 2d 695, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4846, 1998 WL 209010
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edwards v. Edwards. Read the opinion of the Court — 730 So. 2d 711
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 1998·No. No. 96-4796·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has filed a motion requesting rehearing of our affirmance of the trial court’s denial of alimony and of the trial court’s award as to child support. As to the alimony issue, we deny rehearing.

We grant appellant’s motion as to the child support issue, and hereby amend the opinion previously issued as to that point. Consistent with our findings pertaining to attorney’s fees, it appears that in the determination of appellee’s monthly income, the trial court did not take into account the appellee’s expense account for entertainment, as well as the reimbursements he receives for automotive expenses.

Therefore, in regard to appellee’s monthly income we reverse the trial court’s determination as to child support, and remand that issue to be reconsidered in light of the overlooked matters.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. Edwards, 708 So. 2d 695, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4846, 1998 WL 209010 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

708 So. 2d 695 (Edwards v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.