Edwards v. Cybex International, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedDecember 14, 2022
Docket7:22-cv-02985
StatusUnknown

This text of Edwards v. Cybex International, Inc. (Edwards v. Cybex International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwards v. Cybex International, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Lynda Edwards and Richard Edwards, Case No.: 7:22-cv-02985-KMK

Plaintiffs,

vs. STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE

ORDER Cybex International, Inc.,

Defendant.

WHEREAS the parties having agreed to the following terms of confidentiality, and the Court having found that good cause exists for the issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, It is hereby ORDERED that the following restrictions and procedures shall apply to the information and documents exchanged by the parties in connection with the pre-trial phase of this action: 1. Definitions. As used in this protective order: (a) “Attorney,” means an attorney who has appeared in this action; (b) “Confidential Document,” means a document designated as confidential under this Protective Order; (c) To “Destroy” electronically stored information means to delete from all databases, applications, and file systems so that the information is not accessible without the use of specialized tools or techniques typically used by a forensic expert; (d) “Document,” means information disclosed or produced in discovery, including at a deposition;

(e) “Notice,” or “Notify,” means written and express notice; (f) “Party,” means a party to this action; and (g) “Protected Document,” means a document protected by a privilege or the work-product doctrine. 2. Scope. All material produced or adduced in the course of discovery, including responses to discovery requests, deposition testimony and exhibits, the content of

electronically stored information, tangible thing(s), writings, papers, models, photographs, film, videotapes, transcript of oral testimony whether printed, recorded, or produced by hand or any other mechanical process, and information derived directly therefrom shall by subject to this Stipulated Protective Order. 3. Designating a Document or Deposition as Confidential.

(a) A party or non-party disclosing or producing a document or information may designate it as confidential if the party or non-party contends that it contains: (1) information prohibited from disclosure by statute; (2) information that reveals trade secrets; (3) research, technical, commercial, or financial information that the party has maintained as confidential; (4) medical

information concerning any individual; (5) personal identity information; (6) personnel or employment records of a person who is not a party to this case; (7) information or materials gathered from non-public investigations conducted by internal or external persons or bodies; or (8) any other form or category of information that public disclosure of which would be unreasonably harmful or burdensome to the producing party.

(b) A party or non-party may designate a document as confidential for protection under this Order by conspicuously placing or affixing the words “CONFIDENTIAL” on the document and on all copies thereof, in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of said document. (c) Deposition testimony may be designated as confidential: (1) Identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, all

“Confidential” testimony, by specifying all portions of the testimony that qualify as “Confidential”; or (2) up to 30 days after the deposition, by notifying the parties and those who were present at the deposition, that the entirety of the testimony at the deposition is designated as “Confidential.”

(d) If a witness is expected to testify as to confidential or proprietary information, a party or non-party may request that the witness’s deposition be taken in the presence of only those persons entitled to receive confidential documents. 4. Who May Receive a Confidential Document.

(a) A confidential document may be used only in this action, including any appeal therefore. (b) No person receiving a confidential document may reveal it or its contents, except to: (1) The court and its staff; (2) An attorney or an attorney’s partner, associate, or staff;

(3) A person shown on the face of the confidential document to have authored or received it; (4) A court reporter or videographer retained in connection with this action; (5) Contractors. Those persons specifically engaged for the limited purpose of making copies of the documents or organizing or

processing documents, including outside vendors hired to process electronically stored documents; (5) Witnesses at Depositions. During their depositions, witnesses in this action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary. Witnesses shall not retain a copy of the documents designated as Confidential, except

witnesses may receive a copy of all exhibits marked at their depositions in connection with review of the transcripts, but must promptly return any exhibit containing materials designed as Confidential. (6) Consultants and Experts. Consultants, investigators, or experts

employed by the parties or counsel for the parties to assist in the preparation and trial of this action but only after such persons have completed the certification contained in Appendix A. Counsel for all parties shall maintain such certification and shall provide copies to them to opposing counsel within sixty (60) days following the conclusion of the case;

(7) Others by Consent. Other persons only by written express content of the producing party or upon order of the Court and on such conditions as may be agreed or ordered. (c) A party may supplement the “confidential” mark (see paragraph 3(b)) with the words “attorney’s eyes only,” in which case a confidential document so designated may not be revealed to another party.

(d) If a confidential document is revealed to someone not entitled to receive it, the parties must make reasonable efforts to retrieve it. 5. Serving This Protective Order on a Non-Party. A party serving a subpoena on a non-party must simultaneously serve a copy of this protective order. 6. Inadvertent Failure to Designate. An inadvertent failure to designate a document

as Confidential does not, standing alone, waive the right to do so designate the document. If a party designates a document as Confidential after it was initially produced, the receiving party, on notification of the designation, must make a reasonable effort to assure that the document is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

7. Use of a Confidential Document in Court. (a) Filing. This protective order does not authorize the filing of any document under seal. A confidential document may be filed only in accordance with the applicable New York court rules. (b) Presentation at a Hearing or Proceeding. A party intending to present another party’s or a non-party’s confidential document at a hearing or other

court proceeding must promptly notify the other party or the non-party so that the other party or the non-party may seek relief from the court. (c) Use of Confidential Documents or Information at Trial. Absent further order of the Court with respect to treatment of confidential documents or information at trial, this Stipulated Protective Order shall not apply to any materials once they are introduced at trial and made part of the trial record in

this case. In the event this matter goes to trial, the parties shall prepare and submit to this Court for entry a separate order regarding treatment of confidential documents or information during trial. 8. Changing a Confidential Document’s Designation. (a) Document disclosed or produced by a party. A confidential document

disclosed or produced by a party remains confidential unless the parties agree to change its designation or the court orders otherwise. (b) Document produced by a non-party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris Ice Cream Co. v. Hartsock
90 So. 7 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edwards v. Cybex International, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-cybex-international-inc-nysd-2022.