Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 251

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 23, 1963

DocketNo. 38065

StatusPublished

This text of 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 251 (Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 251 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relators are afforded an adequate remedy by way of appeal. This court will ordinarily, in the exercise of its discretion,, deny a writ of prohibition where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Masterson, v. Ohio State Racing Comm., 164 Ohio St., 312, 316. See State, ex rel. Libbeg-Owens-F ord Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St., 302.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained and a writ of prohibition denied.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Relators are afforded an adequate remedy by way of appeal. This court will ordinarily, in the exercise of its discretion,, deny a writ of prohibition where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Masterson, v. Ohio State Racing Comm., 164 Ohio St., 312, 316. See State, ex rel. Libbeg-Owens-F ord Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St., 302.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained and a writ of prohibition denied.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-1963.