Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 251

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 23, 1963·No. No. 38065·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relators are afforded an adequate remedy by way of appeal. This court will ordinarily, in the exercise of its discretion,, deny a writ of prohibition where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Masterson, v. Ohio State Racing Comm., 164 Ohio St., 312, 316. See State, ex rel. Libbeg-Owens-F ord Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St., 302.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained and a writ of prohibition denied.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Relators are afforded an adequate remedy by way of appeal. This court will ordinarily, in the exercise of its discretion,, deny a writ of prohibition where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Masterson, v. Ohio State Racing Comm., 164 Ohio St., 312, 316. See State, ex rel. Libbeg-Owens-F ord Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St., 302.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained and a writ of prohibition denied.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 251 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 251 (Edwards v. Court of Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.