Edwards v. City of Watertown

247 A.D. 860
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment modified by striking therefrom paragraphs designated as 4, 5, 6 and 7 and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the respondents. Memorandum: We rest our decision upon the single ground that the building permit issued on November 9, 1934, followed by the performance, prior to November 26, 1934, of a substantial amount of work under a contract entered into by the plaintiff Frank H. Edwards for the construction of foundations and pits incidental to the proposed erection of a gasoline station, vested in the plaintiffs such rights as could not be divested either by the attempted revocation of such permit by the city engineer, or by the change in the permissible use of plaintiffs’ property by the amendment to the zoning ordinance adopted November 26, 1934. (People ex rel. Ortenberg v. Bales, 224 App. Div. 87; affd., 250 N. Y. [861]*861598.) All concur. (The judgment declares plaintiffs’ right to construct a gasoline station.) Present — Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. City of Watertown, 247 A.D. 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

247 A.D. 860 (Edwards v. City of Watertown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ABM Builders, Inc. v. Gribetz
49 Misc. 2d 1053 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)
Town of Wheatland v. Esso Standard Oil Co.
2 Misc. 2d 784 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)