Edwards v. City of Atlanta

52 S.E. 297, 124 Ga. 78, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 650
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 9, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

In a proceeding before a recorder’s court of a city against a defendant charged with violating a municipal ordinance, it is necessary to show the venue of the offense, and this is not sufficiently done by showing that the matter under investigation took place at “Ponce de Leon Park,” it not appearing from the evidence whether or not the place so designated is within the tract of land described in the act of 1877, by which certain land was included within the corporate limits of the City of Atlanta for police purposes. See Acts 1877, pp. 141-2; Code of Atlanta, 1899, §18.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. City of Atlanta, 52 S.E. 297, 124 Ga. 78, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 650 (Ga. 1905).

52 S.E. 297 (Edwards v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia Power Co. v. Woodall
172 S.E. 76 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)