Edwards v. Butler

Mississippi Supreme Court

Edwards v. Butler

47 So. 801, 94 Miss. 678

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edwards v. Butler. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Miss. 179 →

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1909·Published

Opinion

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment of the court below is correct. It was proper, •on the facts of this case, to allow the value of the improvements. This is clearly settled by the case of Litchfield v. Johnson, 15 Fed. Cas. 590 (No. 8,387), and Wells v. Riley, 29 Fed. Cas. 675 (No. 17,404), and by our own case of Hicks v. Blakeman, 74 Miss. 459, 21 South. 7, Ib. 400. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment of the court below is correct. It was proper, •on the facts of this case, to allow the value of the improvements. This is clearly settled by the case of Litchfield v. Johnson, 15 Fed. Cas. 590 (No. 8,387), and Wells v. Riley, 29 Fed. Cas. 675 (No. 17,404), and by our own case of Hicks v. Blakeman, 74 Miss. 459, 21 South. 7, Ib. 400. Affirmed.

Edwards v. Butler, 47 So. 801, 94 Miss. 678 (Mich. 1909).

Pincite

47 So. 801 (Edwards v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related