Edwards v. 727 Throgs Neck Expressway, Inc.

24 A.D.3d 290, 808 N.Y.S.2d 28
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered February 19, 2004, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a fall on defendants’ premises, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, affirmed, without costs.

The action was properly dismissed for lack of evidence that defendants received any complaints or otherwise acquired actual notice of the alleged wetness, or that the wetness had existed for a sufficient period of time for defendants to have acquired constructive notice (see Matcousky v Days Hotel, 10 AD3d 557 [2004]). That it had been snowing, and that defendants had a security guard posted near where plaintiff fell, do not, by themselves, raise an issue of fact as to notice (Verde-Stefani v Melohn Props., Inc., 13 AD3d 255 [2004]). We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Sullivan, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. 727 Throgs Neck Expressway, Inc., 24 A.D.3d 290, 808 N.Y.S.2d 28 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

24 A.D.3d 290 (Edwards v. 727 Throgs Neck Expressway, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. Rockefeller Group International, Inc.
38 A.D.3d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)