Edwards, Kevin Dewayne
This text of Edwards, Kevin Dewayne (Edwards, Kevin Dewayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-83,541-04, -05 & -06
EX PARTE KEVIN DEWAYNE EDWARDS, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 28607A-422, 28935A-422 & 29904A-422 IN THE 422ND DISTRICT COURT FROM KAUFMAN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of
unauthorized use of a vehicle in cause number 28607-422 and evading arrest in cause numbers
28935-422 and 29904-422.1 He was sentenced to imprisonment for one year on each count. He
appealed his convictions in cause number 28935-422. The Fifth Court of Appeals dismissed his
1 In cause numbers 28935-422 and 29904-422, Applicant was also convicted of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver and sentenced to imprisonment for nineteen years. 2
appeal. Edwards v. State, No. 05-12-00998-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 9, 2013) (not designated
for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that he is actually innocent and trial counsel
rendered ineffective assistance. It appears that the sentences for Applicant’s unauthorized use of a
vehicle and evading arrest convictions have discharged, but the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice (TDCJ) has no record of these convictions.
Accordingly, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the judgments of
conviction were sent to TDCJ and when the sentences discharge for Applicant’s unauthorized use
of a vehicle and evading arrest convictions.
These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 16, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edwards, Kevin Dewayne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-kevin-dewayne-texcrimapp-2015.