Edwards, Ex Parte Kendrick Earl

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 24, 2010
DocketAP-76,294
StatusPublished

This text of Edwards, Ex Parte Kendrick Earl (Edwards, Ex Parte Kendrick Earl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwards, Ex Parte Kendrick Earl, (Tex. 2010).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,294

EX PARTE KENDRICK EARL EDWARDS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 39842 IN THE 400TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FORT BEND COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to forty-five years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals dismissed the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Edwards v. State, No. 01-07-00822-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [1st

Dist.] Feb. 28, 2008) (not designated for publication).

Applicant’s original application alleged several instances of ineffective assistance of trial

counsel. While this application was at the trial court on remand, Applicant supplemented his habeas 2

application on the correct form and alleged that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because

he failed to timely file a notice of appeal.

The trial court has determined that Applicant is entitled to an-out-of time appeal. We agree.

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the

judgment of conviction in Cause No. 39842 from the 400th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend

County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be

calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues.

We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file

a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1997).

Delivered: February 24, 2010 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edwards, Ex Parte Kendrick Earl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-ex-parte-kendrick-earl-texcrimapp-2010.