Edward Youngblood v. Morrison Grain Co., Inc.
This text of 591 F.2d 1207 (Edward Youngblood v. Morrison Grain Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
591 F.2d 1207
Edward YOUNGBLOOD et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MORRISON GRAIN CO., INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 78-2836
Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
March 21, 1979.
Roy S. Halcomb, Jr., Alexandria, La., Roy S. Halcomb, Sr., Ferriday, La., Charles C. Trascher, III, Monroe, La., Dwight W. Norton, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Theus, Grisham, Davis & Leigh, R. L. Davis, Jr., Monroe, La., for defendants-appellees.
Before COLEMAN, FAY and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of Judge Tom Stagg, W.D.La.1978, --- F.Supp. ----.
AFFIRMED.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
591 F.2d 1207, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-youngblood-v-morrison-grain-co-inc-ca5-1979.