Edward Watkins v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Edward Watkins v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections

527 F.2d 1336, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12518

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 1976

Docket75--3598

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 527 F.2d 1336 (Edward Watkins v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edward Watkins v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 527 F.2d 1336, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12518 (5th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner was convicted upon his plea of guilty of murder with malice in Texas state court and received a fifty-year sentence. Before seeking relief in Federal court, petitioner sought habeas corpus before the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. In state court, petitioner alleged that before a guilty plea could be accepted the district attorney had to affirmatively state in writing that the prosecution would not seek the death penalty. Contending that no such written notice was filed in his case, petitioner argued solely that his guilty plea should be vacated under state law. The state court held that no written notice was required under Texas law and denied the petition. Ex parte Watkins, 489 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. Cr.App.1973).

Subsequently, petitioner presented the district court with a petition for habeas corpus contending that he was unconstitutionally coerced by the Texas procedure to waive his right to a trial by jury. The district court denied the petitioner’s claim on the merits. Even though petitioner alleged generally the same facts in both his state and federal petitions, he has never presented his constitutional issue to the state court. Since petitioner has not exhausted his state remedies, the cause is vacated and remanded with instructions to the district court to dismiss without prejudice as to all issues. See, Lamberti v. Wainwright, 513 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1975); Minafee v. Estelle, 491 F.2d 1096 (5th Cir. 1974).

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner was convicted upon his plea of guilty of murder with malice in Texas state court and received a fifty-year sentence. Before seeking relief in Federal court, petitioner sought habeas corpus before the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. In state court, petitioner alleged that before a guilty plea could be accepted the district attorney had to affirmatively state in writing that the prosecution would not seek the death penalty. Contending that no such written notice was filed in his case, petitioner argued solely that his guilty plea should be vacated under state law. The state court held that no written notice was required under Texas law and denied the petition. Ex parte Watkins, 489 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. Cr.App.1973).

Subsequently, petitioner presented the district court with a petition for habeas corpus contending that he was unconstitutionally coerced by the Texas procedure to waive his right to a trial by jury. The district court denied the petitioner’s claim on the merits. Even though petitioner alleged generally the same facts in both his state and federal petitions, he has never presented his constitutional issue to the state court. Since petitioner has not exhausted his state remedies, the cause is vacated and remanded with instructions to the district court to dismiss without prejudice as to all issues. See, Lamberti v. Wainwright, 513 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1975); Minafee v. Estelle, 491 F.2d 1096 (5th Cir. 1974).

Vacated and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 F.2d 1336, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-watkins-v-w-j-estelle-jr-director-texas-department-of-ca5-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack