EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA v. HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER
This text of EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA v. HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER (EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA v. HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA,
Appellant,
v.
HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER,
Appellee.
No. 2D23-41
February 9, 2024
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; David R. Ellis, Judge.
Kathy C. George of Law Offices of Kathy C. George & Associates, Dunedin, for Appellant.
Angela L. Leiner of Mockler Leiner Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA v. HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-wanyama-barasa-v-heidi-huntington-steiner-fladistctapp-2024.