EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA v. HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 2024
Docket23-0041
StatusPublished

This text of EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA v. HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER (EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA v. HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA v. HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA,

Appellant,

v.

HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-41

February 9, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; David R. Ellis, Judge.

Kathy C. George of Law Offices of Kathy C. George & Associates, Dunedin, for Appellant.

Angela L. Leiner of Mockler Leiner Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
EDWARD WANYAMA BARASA v. HEIDI HUNTINGTON STEINER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-wanyama-barasa-v-heidi-huntington-steiner-fladistctapp-2024.