Edward Wahl v. S. James Bellissimo, III

831 F.2d 298, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13151, 1987 WL 44955
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 1987
Docket86-1475
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 831 F.2d 298 (Edward Wahl v. S. James Bellissimo, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward Wahl v. S. James Bellissimo, III, 831 F.2d 298, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13151, 1987 WL 44955 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

831 F.2d 298

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Edward WAHL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
S. James BELLISSIMO, III, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-1475

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

October 5, 1987.

ORDER

Before KEITH, MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

The appeal of this action came on to be heard on October 2, 1987, at which time counsel for the defendant-appellant conceded during oral argument, as is shown by the record, that a final judgment has not been entered in the district court inasmuch as the district court bifurcated the issues of liability and damages, and only the issue of liability has been decided to date by the district court. As the issue of damages has not been determined by the district court, no appealable final judgment has been entered in the district court. See Rudd Constr. Equip Co., Inc. v. Home Ins. Co., 711 F.2d 54, 56 (6th Cir. 1983) ('A . . . judgment which resolves one aspect of the question of liability but leaves the issue of damages in dispute is neither 'final' within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 nor certifiable under Rule 54(b).'). See also Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737 (1976).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this appeal be and it hereby is dismissed, and this case is remanded to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart Surgical, Inc. v. Ultracision, Inc.
92 F. Supp. 2d 40 (D. Rhode Island, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 F.2d 298, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13151, 1987 WL 44955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-wahl-v-s-james-bellissimo-iii-ca6-1987.