Edward Vinson v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States
Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-25-00599-CV
EDWARD VINSON, Appellant
V.
SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, AN OFFICER OF THE UNITED STATES, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2025-006361-1
Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On December 23, 2025, we notified appellant that the trial-court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, by January 2, 2026, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3.
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: January 30, 2026
In other correspondence with appellant, we notified him that his docketing 1
statement had not been filed and directed him to file a docketing statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. Appellant has not filed a docketing statement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edward Vinson v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States (Edward Vinson v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.