Edward Vinson v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
DecidedJanuary 30, 2026
Docket02-25-00599-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Edward Vinson v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States (Edward Vinson v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward Vinson v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00599-CV ___________________________

EDWARD VINSON, Appellant

V.

SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, AN OFFICER OF THE UNITED STATES, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2025-006361-1

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On December 23, 2025, we notified appellant that the trial-court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has

not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution unless, by January 2, 2026, appellant arranged to pay for the

clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c),

37.3(b), 44.3.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record,

we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),

42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 30, 2026

In other correspondence with appellant, we notified him that his docketing 1

statement had not been filed and directed him to file a docketing statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. Appellant has not filed a docketing statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edward Vinson v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, an Officer of the United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-vinson-v-secretary-of-the-us-department-of-veterans-affairs-an-txctapp2-2026.