EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY v. DORIS TIMMONS

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 23, 2022
DocketA22A1379
StatusPublished

This text of EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY v. DORIS TIMMONS (EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY v. DORIS TIMMONS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY v. DORIS TIMMONS, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 23, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1379. EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY v. DORIS TIMMONS et al.

Edward Tyrone Ridley filed this pro se civil action against several prison officials at Wilcox State Prison and another employee of the Department of Corrections, asserting that they denied his attempts to send certified mail.1 The trial court dismissed the action for failure to comply with the requirements of the Georgia Tort Claims Act, and Ridley filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, an appeal in a civil action filed by a prisoner must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 42-12-8; OCGA § 5-6-35; Brock v. Hardman, 303 Ga. 729, 731 (2) (814 SE2d 736) (2018). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Because Ridley was incarcerated when he filed this civil action, his failure to comply with the discretionary appeals procedure deprives us of jurisdiction

1 At the time he filed the underlying lawsuit, Ridley was incarcerated at Wilcox State Prison. In the notice of appeal, he gives Washington State Prison as his address. over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Brock, 303 Ga. at 731 (2). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/23/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Brock v. Hardman
814 S.E.2d 736 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Brock v. Hardman
303 Ga. 729 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY v. DORIS TIMMONS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-tyrone-ridley-v-doris-timmons-gactapp-2022.