Edward Tyrone Ridley v. Attorney General of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edward Tyrone Ridley v. Attorney General of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 1, 2015

Docket15-0280

StatusPublished

This text of Edward Tyrone Ridley v. Attorney General of Florida (Edward Tyrone Ridley v. Attorney General of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edward Tyrone Ridley v. Attorney General of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-0280

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GEORGIA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF GEORGIA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed April 1, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Edward Tyrone Ridley, pro se, Petitioner.

Hon. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI