EDWARD TIGER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of EDWARD TIGER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (EDWARD TIGER v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
EDWARD TIGER, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-2855
[January 16, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-010555-CF10A.
Dane K. Chase of Chase Law Florida, P.A., Saint Petersburg, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
EDWARD TIGER v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-tiger-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.