Edward Thompson v. Sylvia Wright

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 20, 2022·No. 02-22-00255-CV·Published

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00255-CV ___________________________

EDWARD THOMPSON, Appellant

V.

SYLVIA WRIGHT, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2022-01095

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On September 30, 2022, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has

not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution unless, by October 10, 2022, appellant arranged to pay for the

clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c),

37.3(b), 44.3.

Because appellant has not provided us with proof of payment for the clerk’s

record, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.1 See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 20, 2022

In other letters to appellant, we notified him that his docketing statement had 1

not been filed and directed him to file a docketing statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. Appellant has not filed a docketing statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edward Thompson v. Sylvia Wright, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Edward Thompson v. Sylvia Wright (Edward Thompson v. Sylvia Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.