Edward Thompson Co. v. Henson

219 S.W. 27, 142 Ark. 504, 1920 Ark. LEXIS 69
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 8, 1920
StatusPublished

This text of 219 S.W. 27 (Edward Thompson Co. v. Henson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward Thompson Co. v. Henson, 219 S.W. 27, 142 Ark. 504, 1920 Ark. LEXIS 69 (Ark. 1920).

Opinion

McCulloch, C. J.

Appellant is a foreign corporation engaged in the publication ;of law books, and entered into a written contract with appellee for the sale to the latter of a current set of law reports at a stipulated price. The contract of sale covered 28 volumes of the published reports at the price of $5 per volume and two digests for $7^, and it was stipulated that the payments were to be made, $7 cash, and “the balance in installments of $10 each, to be evidenced by my notes payable every two months from date thereof. ’ ’ The contract also contained a subscription for the -uiipublished volumes. Appellee executed notes in accordance with the contract, and later received four additional volumes of the reports as the same were published, and made payments in the aggregate of $62, leaving a balance of $117, as evidenced by nine of the notes and an open account for $27.

Appellant instituted this action against appellee in the circuit court- of Pope County, exhibiting the original contract and the account and the notes. Appellee entered a plea to the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that the suit was on the notes and the additional account, and was not within the jurisdiction of the court. The circuit court sustained the plea and dismissed the action.

The suit was necessarily on the notes and the open account for $27, all of which constituted separate causes of action within the exclusive jurisdiction of justices of the peace. The facts of the case are identical with the facts in American Soda Fountain Co. v. Battle, 85 Ark. 213, and the decision in that case is conclusive of the present case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Soda Fountain Co. v. Battle
107 S.W. 672 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 S.W. 27, 142 Ark. 504, 1920 Ark. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-thompson-co-v-henson-ark-1920.