EDWARD SAMUEL KALIS v. CARMEN M. KALIS

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 2019
Docket18-3062
StatusPublished

This text of EDWARD SAMUEL KALIS v. CARMEN M. KALIS (EDWARD SAMUEL KALIS v. CARMEN M. KALIS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
EDWARD SAMUEL KALIS v. CARMEN M. KALIS, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

EDWARD SAMUEL KALIS, Appellant,

v.

CARMEN M. KALIS a/k/a CARMITA KALIS, et al., Appellees.

No. 4D18-3062

[October 23, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrea Gundersen, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 17- 006553.

Terrence P. O’Connor of Morgan, Carratt & O’Connor, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Caryn A. Stevens and Eddie Stephens of Ward, Damon, Posner, Pheterson & Bleau, West Palm Beach, for appellee Carmen M. Kalis a/k/a Carmita Kalis.

GERBER, J.

The former husband appeals from the circuit court’s final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The former husband raises several arguments, one of which has merit, as the former wife concedes. That is, the trial court erred in including within the assessment of attorney’s fees and costs $3,766.50 for clerical work which the former wife’s attorney’s secretary performed. See, e.g., Youngblood v. Youngblood, 91 So. 3d 190, 192 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (clerical or secretarial activities are not properly included in an attorney’s fee award). We agree with the concession of error on this argument, and remand for the trial court to enter an amended final judgment of dissolution which deducts that $3,766.50 sum.

On all of the former husband’s other arguments on appeal, we affirm without further discussion.

Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded for amendment of judgment. DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Youngblood v. Youngblood
91 So. 3d 190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
EDWARD SAMUEL KALIS v. CARMEN M. KALIS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-samuel-kalis-v-carmen-m-kalis-fladistctapp-2019.