Edward S. Zerwekh Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Edward S. Zerwekh Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 561

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 10, 1957

DocketReap. Dec. 8894; Entry Nos. 341; 2788

StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 561 (Edward S. Zerwekh Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edward S. Zerwekh Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 561 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement relate to certain binoculars and cases exported from Japan and entered at the port of Los Angles, Calif.

The cases have been submitted on an agreed set of facts, establishing export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and showing such statutory value for these binoculars and cases to be the unit values as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, less deductions from said unit values of “(F. O. B.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage,” as invoiced, net packed, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement relate to certain binoculars and cases exported from Japan and entered at the port of Los Angles, Calif.

The cases have been submitted on an agreed set of facts, establishing export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and showing such statutory value for these binoculars and cases to be the unit values as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, less deductions from said unit values of “(F. O. B.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage,” as invoiced, net packed, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Cust. Ct. 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-s-zerwekh-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.