Edward S. Woodward, Sir., and Lillian M. Woodward v. United States
445 F.2d 1406, 28 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 71
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 3, 1971
Docket71-1444
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 445 F.2d 1406 (Edward S. Woodward, Sir., and Lillian M. Woodward v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Edward S. Woodward, Sir., and Lillian M. Woodward v. United States, 445 F.2d 1406, 28 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 71 (4th Cir. 1971).
Opinion
We have carefully considered the briefs, the Appendix, and the record and conclude that oral argument is unnecessary. We, therefore, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodward v. United States, 322 F.Supp. 332 (W.D.Va.1971).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Security Benefit Life Insurance v. United States
517 F. Supp. 740 (D. Kansas, 1980)
Lansons, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellee
622 F.2d 774 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
H. Douglas Wilson, and Roberta D. Wilson v. United States
588 F.2d 1168 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)
Anderson, Clayton & Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
562 F.2d 972 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
445 F.2d 1406, 28 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-s-woodward-sir-and-lillian-m-woodward-v-united-states-ca4-1971.