Edward S. Woodward, Sir., and Lillian M. Woodward v. United States
445 F.2d 1406, 28 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 71
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 1971·No. 71-1444·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
We have carefully considered the briefs, the Appendix, and the record and conclude that oral argument is unnecessary. We, therefore, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodward v. United States, 322 F.Supp. 332 (W.D.Va.1971).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edward S. Woodward, Sir., and Lillian M. Woodward v. United States, 445 F.2d 1406, 28 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 71 (4th Cir. 1971).
445 F.2d 1406 (Edward S. Woodward, Sir., and Lillian M. Woodward v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Security Benefit Life Insurance v. United States
517 F. Supp. 740 (D. Kansas, 1980)
Lansons, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellee
622 F.2d 774 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
H. Douglas Wilson, and Roberta D. Wilson v. United States
588 F.2d 1168 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)
Anderson, Clayton & Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
562 F.2d 972 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)