Edward Rodriguez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 23, 2002
Docket13-01-00682-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Edward Rodriguez v. State (Edward Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward Rodriguez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-01-682-CR

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

EDWARD RODRIGUEZ,                                                          Appellant,

                                                   v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                          Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

                        On appeal from the 105th District Court

                                  of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

                                   O P I N I O N

                   Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

                                       Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, Edward Rodriguez, perfected an appeal from a judgment revoking community supervision.  The trial court granted appellant=s motion for reconsideration, and on October 9, 2001, entered an order setting aside judgment of revocation and reinstating community supervision and imposing sanctions on defendant.  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

In Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977), the Court held that a defendant may not appeal from an order continuing a defendant on probation with amended terms and conditions.  There is neither constitutional nor statutory authority which would confer jurisdiction on this Court to hear an appeal from an order modifying probationary conditions.  Basaldua, 558 S.W.2d at 5.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 23rd day of May, 2002.


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Basaldua v. State
558 S.W.2d 2 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edward Rodriguez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-rodriguez-v-state-texapp-2002.